An optimized circular polymerase extension reaction-based method for functional analysis of SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: Reverse genetics systems have been crucial for studying specific viral genes and their relevance in the virus lifecycle, and become important tools for the rational attenuation of viruses and thereby for vaccine design. Recent rapid progress has been made in the establishment of reverse genetics systems for functional analysis of SARS-CoV-2, a coronavirus that causes the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic that has resulted in detrimental public health and economic burden. Among the different reverse genetics approaches, circular polymerase extension reaction (CPER) has become one of the leading methodologies to generate recombinant SARS-CoV-2 infectious clones. Although CPER has greatly facilitated SARS-CoV-2 analysis, it still has certain intrinsic limitations that impede the efficiency and robustness of virus rescue. RESULTS: We developed an optimized CPER methodology which, through the use of a modified linker plasmid and by performing DNA nick ligation and direct transfection of permissive cells, overcomes certain intrinsic limitations of the 'traditional' CPER approaches for SARS-CoV-2, allowing for efficient virus rescue. CONCLUSIONS: The herein described optimized CPER system may facilitate research studies to assess the contribution of SARS-CoV-2 genes and individual motifs or residues to virus replication, pathogenesis and immune escape, and may also be adapted to other viruses.

The accuracy of reverse genetics systems for SARS-CoV-2: Circular polymerase extension reaction versus bacterial artificial chromosome.

Background: Reverse genetics systems to rescue viruses from modified DNA are useful tools to investigate the molecular mechanisms of viruses. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the development of several reverse genetics systems for SARS-CoV-2. The circular polymerase extension reaction (CPER) method enables the rapid generation of recombinant SARS-CoV-2; however, such PCR-based approaches could introduce unwanted mutations due to PCR errors. Methods: To compare the accuracy of CPER and a classic reverse genetics method using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC), SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan/Hu-1/2019 was generated five times using BAC and five times using CPER. These 10 independent virus stocks were then deep sequencing, and the number of substitutions for which the frequency was greater than 10% was counted. Results: No nucleotide substitutions with a frequency of greater than 10% were observed in all five independent virus stocks generated by the BAC method. In contrast, three to five unwanted nucleotide substitutions with a frequency of more than 10% were detected in four of the five virus stocks generated by the CPER. Furthermore, four substitutions with frequencies greater than 20% were generated in three virus stocks by using the CPER. Conclusions: We found that the accuracy of the CPER method is lower than that of the BAC method. Our findings suggest care should be used when employing the CPER method.

Reverse genetics systems for SARS-CoV-2.

The ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused severe public health crises and heavy economic losses. Limited knowledge about this deadly virus impairs our capacity to set up a toolkit against it. Thus, more studies on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) biology are urgently needed. Reverse genetics systems, including viral infectious clones and replicons, are powerful platforms for viral research projects, spanning many aspects such as the rescues of wild-type or mutant viral particles, the investigation of viral replication mechanism, the characterization of viral protein functions, and the studies on viral pathogenesis and antiviral drug development. The operations on viral infectious clones are strictly limited in the Biosafety Level 3 (BSL3) facilities, which are insufficient, especially during the pandemic. In contrast, the operation on the noninfectious replicon can be performed in Biosafety Level 2 (BSL2) facilities, which are widely available. After the outbreak of COVID-19, many reverse genetics systems for SARS-CoV-2, including infectious clones and replicons are developed and given plenty of options for researchers to pick up according to the requirement of their research works. In this review, we summarize the available reverse genetics systems for SARS-CoV-2, by highlighting the features of these systems, and provide a quick guide for researchers, especially those without ample experience in operating viral reverse genetics systems.

Establishment of a reverse genetics system for SARS-CoV-2 using circular polymerase extension reaction.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been identified as the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although multiple mutations have been observed in SARS-CoV-2, functional analysis of each mutation of SARS-CoV-2 has been limited by the lack of convenient mutagenesis methods. In this study, we establish a PCR-based, bacterium-free method to generate SARS-CoV-2 infectious clones. Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 could be rescued at high titer with high accuracy after assembling 10 SARS-CoV-2 cDNA fragments by circular polymerase extension reaction (CPER) and transfection of the resulting circular genome into susceptible cells. The construction of infectious clones for reporter viruses and mutant viruses could be completed in two simple steps: introduction of reporter genes or mutations into the desirable DNA fragments (∼5,000 base pairs) by PCR and assembly of the DNA fragments by CPER. This reverse genetics system may potentially advance further understanding of SARS-CoV-2.